In the graphs of CWL 15, pages 121-25, it is easy to become disoriented by the symbols on the vertical axes and by the titles and annotations. In particular, one might tend mistakenly to view ** Q** as a symbol for an absolute quantity or an accumulation rather than for a

**rate of flow**of a quantity. Recall:

In Lonergan’s circulation analysis,

the basic terms are rates–ratesof productive activities andratesof payments. The objective of the analysis is to discover the underlying intelligible and dynamic (accelerative) network of functional, mutually conditioning, and interdependentrelationships of these rates to one another. [CWL 15 26-27 ftnt 27]Lonergan

never used terms for magnitudes, only forrates and their accelerations (‘rates of rates’)in theEssay in Circulation Analysis. [CWL 15, 182]But if the ultimate product

qis related by a double summation to the contributions of factors of production_{i}q, then the total_{ijk}flowof ultimate products Q_{i}is also related by a double summation to theof the factors of productionratesof the contributionsQwhere both_{ijk},Qand_{i}Qare instances of_{ijk}the form‘so much or so many every so often.’(CWL 15, 30)In the graphs superscripts identify basic (‘) or surplus (“) elements. Absence of superscripts here indicates “in any case.”